Wünschen Sie nähere Informationen?


    How do cognitive biases affect companies in their efforts to deliver an outstanding Customer Experience?

    Home Blog IT Trends

    After reading Rolf Dobelli’s book “The Art of Thinking Clearly” and while investing some time in reading about failed Customer Experience initiatives (for example here, or on this great post by Don Peppers). I started thinking about how some common mental biases might affect the Customer Experience efforts in organizations.

    Below are some of the most commonly known cognitive biases that may impact teams and management while trying to deliver the best Customer Experience. In your opinion, which ones play a role in CX? Which ones may lead CX initiatives to fail?

    Survivorship bias: Leads you to overestimate chances of success, because successes are much more visible than failures. When we only pay attention to people or initiatives that succeeded and ignore those who failed, we risk becoming overly optimistic. Visiting the cemetery of failed initiatives helps build awareness. Do we overestimate the chances of our CX to succeed because we have heard/read about other successes and not about the failures?

    Sunk cost fallacy: The tendency not to discontinue or stop an activity or initiative only because of the investment (effort, money, emotion, etc) already made, even when the activity is an obvious failure. “I Have already read half the book, I may as well finish it” (even if I don’t like it). “We have already invested 10 Millions in this campaign, it would be a huge waste to stop it” (even if it’s not achieving results). Are we rational enough to realize when an initiative (CX, for example) should be stopped or changed?

    Incentive-super response tendency: A couple of hundreds of years ago a colony issued a law to address a rat plague: For each dead rat someone brought, that person would get some cash. The result of the law was not a reduced rat population; it was that people started breeding rats. We react to incentives, not to the intentions behind incentives. Good incentive plans need to harmonize incentive and intention. A good example: In ancient Rome, bridge builders had to stand below the bridge they had built when it got inaugurated. In my career I have seen incentive plans or goals set for service teams that did not necessarily harmonize the intention and the incentive. How big of an issue is this for a companies’ CX?

    Confirmation bias: We tend to interpret new information in a way that it matches our existing theories and beliefs. Disconfirming evidence is minimized, treated as special case or exception. We are more likely to believe information that confirms opinions we already have.

    Hindsight bias: Looking back, events seem to have been perfectly predictable, while in reality they were far from that. This bias lets us believe we are much better predictors than we really are. We are often not aware of how volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) the world is.

    Outcome bias: Judge a decision based only on the outcome and not on the decision-taking process. Outcomes are important, but we should not judge the decisions that have been taken only by the outcome.

    Dunning-Kruger effect: When confidence and experience are mismatched. Some people are full of confidence, even when it’s clear that they have no idea what they are doing. This sometimes leads people with low ability to have an illusion of superiority. It works both ways, often very capable people are less confident in their skills.

    Planning fallacy: When we underestimate the time and effort it takes to complete a task or project. When we plan only for best case scenarios and have difficulties in correcting the course when things - shockingly - don’t go as planned. I have seen this frequently and have been a victim of the fallacy myself.

    Availability Bias: We believe that first thing that comes to mind (the information that is more easily accessible or more recent) is most important. Going to the VoC and customer behavior data instead of acting instinctively could be a way to beat this bias in CX initiatives.

    Reciprocity Bias: We can’t stand to owe someone something. We tend to want to pay our debts. (The reason why clients or prospects get invited to soccer games or dinner)

    Here, as an example, what Google does to beat unconscious bias in the workplace.

    In your opinion, which ones play a role in CX? Which ones may lead CX initiatives to fail?

    Cloud ist nicht gleich Cloud (Update 20.08.2019)

    Oct 19, 2018 8:54:00 AM Was ist die Cloud – und gibt es überhaupt „die Cloud“? Tatsächlich existieren ganz unterschiedliche Verwendungszwecke. Wann ist Cloud-Computing sinnvoll? Wichtig ist die richtige Balance zwischen ...

    Digital Transformation: Does slow and steady really win the race, or does fortune favor the brave?

    Mar 21, 2017 7:23:00 AM As every business leader knows, the digital transformation of the economy is revolutionary. Companies are in a race. There will be winners and losers. Some will make it big, some will not make it at ...

    Digital workplace: Let them make a difference!

    Jun 22, 2017 9:00:00 AM For the last decade, employees have been the driving force in defining tomorrow’s digital workplace. By seamlessly integrating technology into their private lives, they have started to transform ...

    Lernt agitales Denken!

    Mar 6, 2017 1:00:00 PM „Typisch deutsches“ Denken verhindert disruptive Innovationen der Digitalisierung. Wir müssen als Gesellschaft lernen, agital zu denken. Dabei kann die Schule helfen. Dieser Beitrag erschien in der ...

    Neue Online-Welten für den ältesten Verkehrsverbund der Erde

    Feb 21, 2017 9:00:00 AM Der Leipziger Digital-Dienstleister EWERK stellt die Online-Portale des Hamburger Verkehrsverbunds (HVV) auf eine neue technische Basis und erfrischt die Auftritte inhaltlich wie optisch. Dies ...

    Arbeit in der Sharing Economy: Mit Vollgas in den Ausbildungs-Kollaps

    May 24, 2017 4:09:54 PM Wir sind nicht gerüstet für die digitalisierte Gesellschaft. Denn es fehlt an gut ausgebildetem Personal – bereits heute. Drei Thesen zur Zukunft der Ausbildung und Arbeit in der Sharing Economy.

    Internet of Things: It’s all about “smintegration”

    Jun 29, 2017 9:00:00 AM The Internet of Things is evolving in two directions. While the first is about saving money, the second could actually save lives. For that to become true, devices need to be smart – and integrated.

    Maschinelles Lernen: Der Computer, der selbstständig schlauer wird – oder etwa doch nicht?

    Jul 7, 2017 1:30:00 PM Maschinelles Lernen und intelligente Algorithmen – und darunter insbesondere Deeplearning – sind ein wesentlicher, wenn nicht der Pfeiler der vierten industriellen Revolution. Worum geht es? Wo ...

    Worauf Sie bei der Digitalisierung ihres Archives achten müssen

    Apr 26, 2019 12:17:00 PM Akten in Papierform verstopfen Tausende von Lagerhallen in Deutschland und binden Millionen von Arbeitsstunden. Ein guter digitaler Dokumentenservice befreit alle diese Ressourcen. Auf dem Weg dahin ...

    Innovationen katapultieren Unternehmen und Branchen in neue Dimensionen. Wir wissen, wie.

    Zur Sache: Rein formell ist ein Projekt mit der Abnahme und Entlastung beendet. Das dachten auch die Verantwortlichen des